healthcare journal

see attached for instructions

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"

1) Identify historical, political, economic and ethical factors that influenced development of public health nursing.   2) Discuss how Lillian Wald’s approach…

1) Identify historical, political, economic and ethical factors that influenced development of public health nursing.

 

2) Discuss how Lillian Wald’s approach to individual and community health care provides an understanding of how to facilitate the empowerment of aggregates in the community.  

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"

ASSIGNMENT @4

Hi, I just need to complete PowerPoint that is  been has  already started by another classmate, I Do Not Need Paper , .You must be guided by the data I send below.
It is very important do not  forget the Speaker Notes   that should  appears bellow each slide and in the last slide put the References. Thank you.

 

 

 

Within your group, create a PowerPoint Presentation of 15-20 slides (slide count does not include title and reference slide) describing the chosen community interest.

 

Include the following in your presentation:

 Summary of Community Assessment . Summary of Interview with Community Health/Public Health Provider. A Conclusion summarizing your key findings and a discussion of your impressions of the General Health of the Community.

 

APA format is required for essays only. Solid academic writing is always expected. For all assignment delivery options, documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

 

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"

Ref

 Reflection Journal

Reflect on your final project and how you incorporated your evidence-based resources to support your recommendations. 

Final Project Topic – Pressure Ulcers and vulnerable population (elderly)

Final Project attached below

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"

Searching and Critiquing the Evidence

 

Searching and Critiquing the Evidence

 

Bring to mind the various practice problems you and your colleagues have been considering in this course. What insights might the literature provide with regard to these issues? How should you evaluate the research? And, why is it important to review and critique this information?

This Discussion addresses strategies for searching the literature in order to critique existing evidence. Please note that this Discussion is related to Application Assignment #4, which is assigned this week. You are strongly encouraged to read through that assignment now.

To prepare:

Review the Walden Library Webinars presented in the Learning Resources. Recall the practice problem and theoretical framework you identified for the Week 5   Discussion (See attached file) . Using the Walden Library and other professional databases, conduct a search and locate four (4) appropriate primary research articles one of which is a systematic review. Review the articles and determine what level of evidence they represent. Using the critique strategies presented in the Learning Resources as a guide, consider how the articles you located either support or weaken the merit of your theoretical framework or the importance of your practice problem.

By Wednesday 7/05/17, post 550 words essay in APA format with 2 references from the list below, as well as the 4 references for the articles review that include the level one headings as numbered below:

post  a cohesive response that addresses the following:

1)       How does the literature strengthen or weaken the merit of your selected theoretical framework and practice problem?

2)       What levels of evidence are most prevalent in these articles? (I, II, III, IV or V)

3)       Why do you think that level of evidence is most prevalent?

 

Walden Library Webinars:

 

  Conducting a Literature Search on a Clinical Research Question. Retrieved from: http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/webinararchives/nursing#s-lg-box-9896498

 

  Evidence-Based Health Research Retried from: http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/webinararchives/healthscience#s-lg-box-1523116

 

  Introduction to Health Science Research. Retrieved from: http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/webinararchives/healthscience#s-lg-box-9897916

 

  Medical Research: Finding Reviews. Retrieved from: http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/webinararchives/healthscience#s-lg-box-1525868

 

  Medical Research: Finding Studies by Type. Retrieved from: http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/webinararchives/healthscience#s-lg-box-1526057

 

  Medical Research: Health Policies and Legal Cases. Retrieved from: http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/webinararchives/healthscience#s-lg-box-1526434

 

Recommended Webinars:

  Webinars on Library Skills. Retrieved from: http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/webinararchives/libraryskillswebinars

 

  Evidence Based Practice for NURS 6052. Retrieved from: http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/webinararchives/nursing#s-lg-box-9896497

 

Required Readings

 

Gray, J.R., Grove, S.K., & Sutherland, S. (2017). Burns and Grove’s the practice of nursing research: Appraisal, synthesis, and generation of evidence (8th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Saunders Elsevier.

Chapter 3, “Introduction to Quantitative Research”

  Chapter 3 provides an overview of quantitative research, the concepts associated with this type of research, and different quantitative research designs.

 

Chapter 4, “Introduction to Qualitative Research”

  Chapter 4 describes the philosophy of qualitative research and provides examples of how it is used in nursing research. Understanding the basic principles of quantitative and qualitative research is necessary to effectively critique research literature.

 

Chapter 7, “Review of Relevant Literature”

  Chapter 7 examines the process of preparing for a literature review to support research efforts.

 

Chapter 13, “Outcomes Research”

 

Moran, K., Burson, R., & Conrad, D. (2017). The doctor of nursing practice scholarly project: A framework for success (2nd ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Review Chapter 6, “Developing the Scholarly Project”

 

Armola, R., Bourgault, A., Halm, M., Board, R., Bucher, L., Harrington, L., & … Medina, J. (2009). AACN levels of evidence: What’s new? Critical Care Nurse, 29(4), 70–73. doi: 10.4037/ccn2009969

  Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

  This article provides a hierarchical evidence rating system which can be used as a guide to determine the quality and level of evidence presented in different types of research studies.

 

Elkins, M. Y. (2010). Using PICO and the brief report to answer clinical questions. Nursing, 40(4), 59–60. doi: 10.1097/01.NURSE.0000369871.07714.39

  Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

  The article explains how to use the PICO method to develop clinical questions.

 

 

Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B., Stillwell, S., & Williamson, K. (2010). Critical appraisal of the evidence: Part I an introduction to gathering, evaluating, and recording the evidence… fifth in a series. American Journal of Nursing, 110(7), 47–52. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000383935.22721.9c

  Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

  This article discusses the process of rapid critical analysis of research and literature through the categorization of studies and utilization of an evaluation table.

 

Fineout-Overholt, E., Melnyk, B., Stillwell, S., & Williamson, K. (2010). Critical appraisal of the evidence: Part III the process of synthesis: Seeing similarities and differences across the body of evidence. American Journal of Nursing, 110(11), 43–51. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000390523.99066.b5

  Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

  This article continues the discussion of critical analysis of evidence and concludes with how nurses can then make decisions based on a synthesis of the findings.

 

  Nursing Library and Information Resources Cushing/Whitney Medical Library (n.d.). Levels of evidence pyramid. Retrieved from http://guides.library.yale.edu/ld.php?content_id=11940516

  This article discusses the use of systematic reviews in evidence-based practice and provides sources for locating this type of research article.

 

Duke University Medical Center Library. (2009). Evidence-based clinical practice resources: Hierarchy of evidence-based medicine (EBM) resources. Retrieved from http://guides.mclibrary.duke.edu/content.php?pid=274373&sid=2289252

  Duke University provides this visual representation of levels of evidence.

 

University of Illinois at Chicago. (n.d.) Evidence-based practice in the health sciences: Levels of evidence. Retrieved from http://ebp.lib.uic.edu/nursing/node/12

  This web-based tutorial provides an overview of evidence-based practice and includes a section on developing practice questions for evidence-based projects.

 

  Evidence-Based Nursing. (n.d.) Retrieved from http://ebn.bmj.com/

  This website surveys a wide range of international clinical journals and includes only those research articles that demonstrate high quality and validity.

 

Harvey Cushing/John Hay Whitney Medical Library (n.d.). Finding evidence in PubMed. Retrieved from http://library.medicine.yale.edu/tutorials/577

 

  The Joanna Briggs Institute (n.d.). Retrieved from http://joannabriggs.org/

This international organization was created by the Faculty of Health Sciences at the University of Adelaide in South Australia and provides members with access to systematic reviews and other research efforts.

 

 

Optional Resources

 

Boss, C., & Wurmser, T. A. (2009). Searching for evidence: Mission-critical tips. Nursing Management, 40(9), 12. doi: 10.1097/01.NUMA.0000360766.29235.8e

  Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

 

Coughlan, M., Cronin, P., & Ryan, F. (2007). Step-by-step guide to critiquing research: Part 1: Quantitative research. British Journal of Nursing (BJN), 16(11), 658–663.

  Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

  This article provides strategies for critiquing quantitative research and includes definitions of frequently used research terms.

 

Cronin, P., Ryan, F., & Coughlan, M. (2008). Undertaking a literature review: A step-by-step approach. British Journal of Nursing (BJN), 17(1), 38–43.

  Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

  This article details an approach for nurses to use when analyzing research, synthesizing data, and writing and reporting research findings.

Dale, J. C. (2005). Critiquing research for use in practice. Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 19(3), 183–186. doi:10.1016/j.pedhc.2005.02.004

  Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

 

  Engle, M., Blumethal, A., & Cosgrave, T. (2010). How to prepare an annotated bibliography. Cornell University Library Olin & Uris Libraries: Ask a Librarian. Retrieved from http://olinuris.library.cornell.edu/ref/research/skill28.htm

 

 

Evans, D. (2003). Hierarchy of evidence: A framework for ranking evidence evaluating healthcare interventions. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 12(1), 77–84. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2003.00662.x

  Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

 

 

Hanson, D., Hoss, B. L., & Wsorick, B. (2008). Evaluating the evidence: Guidelines. AORN Journal, 88(2), 188–196.

  Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

 

Holopainen, A., Hakulinen-Viitanen, T., & Tossavainen, K. (2008). Systematic review – A method for nursing research. Nurse Researcher, 16(1), 72–83.

  Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

 

Kleinpell, R. M., Gawlinski, A., & Burns, S. M. (2006). Searching and critiquing literature essential for acute care NPs. Nurse Practioner, 31(8), 12–13.

  Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

 

Parahoo, K., McCaughan, E., Noyes, J., & McDonough, S. (2010). The effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for men with prostate cancer: A systematic review. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (6). doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008529

  Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

This systematic review provides results of psychosocial theories utilized in assisting men with prostate cancer.

 

 

Sherrod, R. A., Ford, C., & Oliver, J. (2010). Using data from the Internet to teach ethical principles for critiquing research studies. Nurse Educator, 35(1), 17–1 9. doi: 10.1097/NNE.0b013e3181c41f8d

  Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

 

 

Tatano-Beck, C. (2009). Critiquing qualitative research. AORN Journal, 90(4), 543. doi: 10.1016/j.aorn.2008.12.023

  Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

 

 

Traynor, M. (2009). Humanism and its critiques in nursing research literature. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 65(7), 1560–1567.

  Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

 

 

  Consortium Library University of Alaska Anchorage (2011). Nursing research guide. Retrieved from http://libguides.consortiumlibrary.org/content.php?pid=44173&sid=330967

 

  The Writing Center (2007). Literature reviews. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Retrieved from http://writingcenter.unc.edu/handouts/literature-reviews/

 

  The University of Wisconsin-Madison Writing Center. (2009). Writer’s handbook: Common writing assignments: Review of literature. Retrieved from http://www.wisc.edu/writing/Handbook/ReviewofLiterature.html

 

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"

Week 5 expert_research

hi 

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"

NSG 5003 Advanced Pathophysiology Discussion post

Due tomorrow 3/20/2020 4PM Eastern time.  Must answer all 3 questions at the bottom and have references within the past 4 years.

By the due date assigned, respond to the case study questions below and submit your responses to the Discussion Area.

Respond to the question using the lessons and vocabulary found in the readings. Support your answers with examples and research. Your responses should clarify your understanding of the topic. They should be your own, original, and free from plagiarism. Follow APA format for writing style, spelling and grammar, and citation of sources.

Start reviewing and responding to the postings of your classmates as early in the week as possible. Respond to at least two of your classmates. Participate in the discussion by analyzing each response for completeness and accuracy and by suggesting specific additions or clarifications for improving the discussion question response. Complete your participation for this assignment by the end of the week.

Case Study:

An 18 year old college student reports a history of episodic attacks of shortness of breath, dry cough, and wheezing for the last 5 years. These symptoms usually occur during a change of weather or whenever she “catches a cold”. Symptoms also reported to worsen during night and early morning. Accompanying symptoms of recurrent sneezing, runny nose, and itchy eyes.
The patient reports she was prescribed some inhaler medications by her practitioner two years ago for use as needed. She stopped the meds as she was concerned over inhaler dependence. Intermittently she takes cough syrup during “attacks” with some help.

PMH: No diagnosed chronic illnesses
SH: College student, single, lives with parents. Father is smoker in the home, use dry wood in the home in fireplace

ROS:
Constitutional: Denies fever, denies weight loss
Respiratory: Denies hemoptysis, reports mostly dry cough
Cardiovascular: Tightness in chest at times
ENT: Denies ear pain, mild rhinorrhea reported, scratchy throat intermittently

Question answers should be based on evidence found in readings and from peer-reviewed literature. At least two sources must be used and cited in APA format for each question. Only one source can be a textbook. Resources should generally be within 5 years unless you are explaining the pathophysiology of a disease or providing pertinent background information.

Discussion Questions: Based on the history provided, the health care provider suspects asthma with varying frequency and intensity. Describe whether this condition is restrictive or obstructive and support with evidence. Describe the pathophysiologic process that occurs with asthma and support with evidence from the literature. Explain what confirmatory testing is evidence based practice for diagnosing asthma and how this information can guide the treatment plan.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"

Discuss the effectiveness of the approach used by a professional to deal with problems or issues involving ethical practice in a case studySummarize the facts in a case study and use the 3 components of an ethical decision-making model to analyze an ethic

   Discuss the effectiveness of the approach used by a professional to deal with problems or issues involving ethical practice in a case study. Summarize the facts in a case study and use the 3 components of an ethical decision-making model to analyze an ethical problem or issue and the factors that contributed to it.

   The ethical decision making-model:  moral awareness, moral judgement, and ethical behavior needs to be included in this paper  apply more than 2 of the ethical principles: autonomy, and nonmaleficence.

  Length: At least 1 page typed, double-spaced pages, not including the title page and reference page. Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point. APA Template: Use the APA Style Paper Template as the paper format and the APA Style Paper Tutorial for guidance. See the Resources for these documents. Written communication: Write clearly and logically, with correct use of spelling, grammar, punctuation, and mechanics. References: Integrate information from outside sources to include at least two references (the case study and an academic peer-reviewed journal article) and three in-text citations within the paper. APA format: Follow current APA guidelines for in-text citation of outside sources in the body of your paper and also on the reference page.

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"

informatica

 

Word Assignment

Assignments being submitted from this point on will need to have the following information in them:

On the File Tab, under INFO (on the right side of your screen), you will see properties. Place your name in the AUTHOR area Your course id (20SprHC) in the SUBJECT area.  

If you do not see any of the areas specified above, look at the bottom for SHOW ALL PROPERTIES.  

This information will also need to be applied to all documents for Word, PowerPoint and Excel.  It will be needed on all assignments submitted from this point on.  Points will be deducted if the information is not included. MAC users will have a different way of entering this information.

Jump over to find Module 1 of Microsoft Word. It is the light blue section in your book.  

Read through this module and complete the exercise about “Surf’s Up!”.  Follow the steps found throughout the chapter.

Complete and SUBMIT the following:   APPLY YOUR KNOWLEDGE page WD48 Follow the steps in your book.  All necessary pictures and documents can be found in the Course Documents section. If it says:  “If requested by your Instructor”, be sure to complete this step Ignore step 27 In The Lab #2 page WD54 Follow the steps in your book.  All necessary pictures and documents can be found in the Course Documents section. If it says:  “If requested by your Instructor”, be sure to complete this step Ignore step 19

The Data Files needed to complete the exercise can be found in the Course Documents section.

Be sure to save your assignment in a .docx format, especially if you are using an Apple or MAC computer.

Due Date:  Sunday,  March 22, 2020 – Midnight

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"

communication in healthcare

You’ve had a chance to review the “start here” sequence that gives an overview of the course design. You also had an opportunity to review the course learning outcomes. Take a moment and review these outcomes. Which outcomes do you have familiarity with already? What previous knowledge do you have that you bring with you into this course? What professional experience connects with the learning outcomes? 

There’s no need to answer every question or address each learning outcome. Rather, focus on one question and the learning outcome(s) that stand out to you the most. In your post, introduce yourself and let your peers know about your professional experience in no more than one sentence, e.g., “I’m Dr. Estee Beck, and I have 12-years experience with teaching undergraduate and graduate students.” 
Learning Outcomes Recall basic conventions for common professional and technical documents when prompted in a workplace setting
Identify distinctions of the varying information needs of primary and secondary audiences, document design principles, and conventional genres Implement technical writing standards to professional and technical documents in order to meet and/or exceed workplace norms Analyze professional writing styles in professional and technical documentation Evaluate professional and technical documents for readability effectiveness in order to approve or revise documents for readers in workplace settings 
Compose professional and technical documents for diverse audiences in order to meet primary and secondary audience information needs Design professional and technical documents using navigation aids and information design principles in order to help readers easily locate, understand, and retain information

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"